Cesar Chavez-Analyzing text structure

Front

Main claim in Section C of the speech?

Back

The original grape boycott won labor protections for farm workers and banned harmful chemicals.

Front

Main claim in Part A of the speech: Consumers will support the boycott due to shared interests with farm workers.

Back

Consumers will support the boycott because we are all of one people, and we have a common purpose.

Front

Main claim in Section E of the speech:

Back

Consumers and workers must unite in a boycott to stop the dangerous practices of the growers.

Front

Main claim in Section B of the speech?

Back

The original grape boycott won labor protections for farm workers and banned harmful chemicals.

Front

Main claim in Section D of the speech?

Back

Examples of negative effects of pesticides on farm workers.

Front

Chavez calls on consumers to join a boycott, appealing to their sense of justice and common cause with farm workers.

Back

Consumers should join the boycott for shared interests with farm workers.

Front

Claim: The original grape boycott secured labor protections and banned harmful chemicals. How does this develop the central claim of the speech?

Back

The last boycott was successful, which shows this boycott can also succeed.

Front

Claim: Governor and growers ignore 1975 law, leading to labor rights violations and harmful pesticide use. How does this develop the speech's central claim?

Back

This section outlines the problem that Chavez says the boycott will address.

Front

Effects of pesticides on farm workers support the main claim by highlighting harm caused by chemicals.

Back

This supports the main claim by showing all of the harm caused by the growers’ chemicals and gives reasons to support the claim that the use of pesticides is a problem and must be stopped.

Front

Claim: Consumers and workers must unite in a boycott to stop dangerous practices of growers. How does this develop the central claim of the speech?

Back

Chavez concludes that consumers should join the boycott as they and farm workers share an interest in halting pesticide use.